6 users online. Create an account or sign in to join them.Users
Swapping out one field type for another
This is an open discussion with 3 replies, filed under General.
Search
Do these two field types use the same method of associating entries from different sections
Hmm, it seems the tables holding data are the same. Try to follow the same instructions as here.
Thanks @vladG - the swap out seems successful.
Here are the steps for converting a SSM field to a SBL+ one (slightly different than the ones you have for going from Upload to Unique Upload):
- Change
sym_fields.typein the row for the SSM field toselectbox_link_plus - In Symphony's backend, load up the section that contains the field for editing, choose the desired options for the "new" Selectbox Link Plus field and save
- Delete the
sym_entries_data_x.quantitycolumn (where x is the id of the field), assuming you don't need it and want to tidy up - Delete redundant row in
sym_fields_subsectionmanager(field_id)
I think the steps would be basically the same for going the other way.
Glad it worked.
In Symphony's backend, load up the section that contains the field for editing, choose the desired options for the "new" Selectbox Link Plus field and save
Hmm, good idea with configuring the field in Admin. More intuitive for the common user.
Create an account or sign in to comment.
Is it possible to swap out a Subsection Manager field for a Select Box Link+ field (or vice versa) whilst maintaining the linked entries?
Do these two field types use the same method of associating entries from different sections, and, if so, is there a recommended way of going about it?